Small States Need Aggressive Info Warfare

Updated: 2025.07.22 3M ago 1 sources
For countries with limited strategic depth, false massacre stories are not PR nuisances but existential threats. The response must be immediate, fact-rich, and evidentiary: publish timelines, coordinates, video/body‑cam clips, and rules‑of‑engagement context rather than vague 'we are investigating' boilerplate. Treat narrative rebuttal as part of operations, not an afterthought. — It reframes wartime communications as a survival function for small states, implying institutions must integrate transparency and rapid proof into doctrine to maintain legitimacy and deterrence.

Sources

Israel won't survive this century if it doesn't defend itself from false massacre and genocide claims
José Duarte 2025.07.22 100% relevant
The author criticizes the IDF’s standard 'warning shots/we’re examining' statements and sketches a concrete alternative reply with distances, restricted zones, and on‑scene facts for alleged Gaza aid‑line shootings.
← Back to All Ideas