Societal reliance on the psychological defense of 'splitting'—reducing complex actors to 'all bad' or 'all good'—creates durable binaries that make politics less about policy tradeoffs and more about personal allegiance and courtly patronage. Over time, that binary morality re‑allocates civic energy into status‑seeking and clientelism, resembling a feudal order of vassalage to charismatic patrons rather than democratic deliberation.
— If accurate, this reframes polarization as a pathological social‑psychological process with structural consequences: it predicts erosion of policy institutions, growth of loyalty networks, and a shift from public reason to patronage politics.
2026.01.04
100% relevant
The article’s concrete claim that Americans cope with Iraq and the Bush presidency by 'splitting' (labeling targets wholly bad or good) and that this civic narcissism will politically produce a feudal‑like order.
← Back to All Ideas