Standards for AI consciousness claims

Updated: 2026.01.15 13D ago 1 sources
Any public claim that an AI system is 'conscious' should trigger a mandated, multi‑disciplinary robustness protocol: preregistered tests, independent replication, formalized phenomenology reporting, and a temporary operational moratorium until evidence meets reproducibility thresholds. The protocol would be short, auditable, and required for legal or regulatory treatment of systems as persons or rights‑bearers. — This creates a practical rule to prevent premature political, legal or ethical decisions about AI personhood and to anchor controversial claims in auditable scientific practice.

Sources

The hard problem of consciousness, in 53 minutes
Annaka Harris 2026.01.15 100% relevant
Annaka Harris’s public synthesis of the hard problem highlights public fascination and the lack of consensus — a precise trigger for instituting a formal provenance/robustness standard before society treats an AI as conscious.
← Back to All Ideas