Because OpenAI’s controlling entity is a nonprofit pledged to 'benefit humanity,' state attorneys general in its home and principal business states (Delaware and California) can probe 'mission compliance' and demand remedies. That gives elected officials leverage over an AI lab’s product design and philanthropy without passing new AI laws.
— It spotlights a backdoor path for political control over frontier AI via charity law, with implications for forum‑shopping, regulatory bargaining, and industry structure.
Corbin K. Barthold
2025.10.15
100% relevant
The article says California and Delaware AGs can decide whether OpenAI is staying true to its mission, potentially extracting concessions during its restructuring with Microsoft.
← Back to All Ideas