When an administration advances ideologically extreme or technically illiterate orders, dissent from figures who are credibly loyal to that administration is disproportionately effective at stopping them. Those collaborators (trusted industry figures, long‑standing partisan experts) are a scarce governance resource whose availability shapes how bad policy gets checked.
— Recognizing and preserving the role of 'inside' dissenters changes advocacy strategy: opponents should recruit and protect regime‑aligned experts rather than only mobilizing partisan outcry.
Scott Alexander
2026.03.18
100% relevant
The author cites anecdotal campaigns (e.g., a late‑stage FDA reversal on an RFK Jr.‑era decision, hypothetical 'aluminum ban') and the T.A.C.O. shorthand for insiders talking administrations out of bad ideas.
← Back to All Ideas