Targeted risk‑based youth tech policy

Updated: 2026.01.04 24D ago 1 sources
Instead of blanket screen‑time limits or moral panics, public policy should prioritize identifying and supporting the minority of adolescents at measurable, elevated risk (e.g., preexisting mental‑health issues, problematic sleep disruption or concentrated high‑exposure tails). Interventions should be built on longitudinal and ecological‑momentary evidence (who, when, what platforms, which interactions) and not on aggregate hours‑per‑day thresholds alone. — Shifting policy from universal bans to evidence‑driven, targeted supports reduces overreach, focuses scarce resources on populations that show causal vulnerability, and avoids amplifying moral panic.

Sources

Adolescent Mental Health in the Digital Age: Facts, Fears and Future Directions - PMC
2026.01.04 100% relevant
Odgers & Jensen review finds small average associations but notes heterogeneity and the importance of intensive EMA and cohort designs to detect who is harmed — this is the direct empirical motive for targeting rather than blanket rules.
← Back to All Ideas