Tech hype versus flood engineering

Updated: 2025.09.17 1M ago 2 sources
Houston is weighing Elon Musk’s proposal for two 12‑foot stormwater tunnels even as engineers say tunnels need to be several times larger to move meaningful flow. Musk claimed on X that Boring’s tunnels 'will work' and cost under 10% of alternatives, but offered no data; experts flag scale, routing, and logistics that his plan doesn’t address. — It shows how social‑media assertions by powerful figures can distort climate‑adaptation choices unless grounded in transparent, peer‑reviewed engineering.

Sources

Elon Musk Has Criticized Environmental Regulations. His Companies Have Been Accused of Sidestepping Them.
by Taylor Kate Brown for ProPublica 2025.09.17 95% relevant
The article recounts Boring Co. proposing much narrower, shallow tunnels than those in expert studies for Houston flooding, with Musk asserting lower cost and higher flow on X without evidence—echoing the concern that social‑media hype can distort serious flood‑engineering decisions.
Elon Musk Pushed Back on Our Reporting on His Houston Tunnels Plan. Experts Say His Comments Are Misleading.
by Yilun Cheng, Houston Chronicle 2025.09.12 100% relevant
Musk’s Aug. 28 X post asserting Boring’s tunnels 'will work' and 'cost <10% of alternatives' for Buffalo Bayou despite expert critiques of tunnel diameter and capacity.
← Back to All Ideas