Technocrats’ competence gap

Updated: 2025.12.02 4D ago 1 sources
Ambitious, coordinated technocratic programmes (exemplified by the 'Great Reset') become politically unsustainable when governing elites repeatedly fail to deliver basic services and transparency. Public exposure of routine administrative breakdowns (missed trains, lost case lists, bungled rollouts) converts reform narratives into evidence of managerial illegitimacy and sharpens resistance to top‑down reform. — This reframes debates about centralised reform from ideological arguments to a practical calculus: competence (delivery of basics and honest accounting) is the precondition for any large‑scale technocratic initiative to gain public legitimacy.

Sources

Why the Great Reset failed
Mary Harrington 2025.12.02 100% relevant
The article cites UK examples (Avanti/rail cancellation, 53,000 asylum seekers lost track, military spreadsheet leak, early prisoner releases) to argue that visible operational failures undercut 'Great Reset' style governance claims.
← Back to All Ideas