Longitudinal, facet‑level data show a consistent adolescent ‘‘dip’’: declines in conscientiousness and agreeableness and a rise in neuroticism (notably larger for girls) between ages ~10–16. Rather than treating adolescent behavior as noise, policymakers should treat this predictable developmental window as an evidence‑based signal to time interventions (school pedagogy, mental‑health screening, and platform age‑policy).
— Designing education, mental‑health services, and youth‑tech rules around a robust, age‑specific personality trajectory would make policies more targeted and effective and avoid one‑size‑fits‑all solutions.
Steve Stewart-Williams
2026.01.10
100% relevant
The article summarizes a longitudinal Norwegian cohort (805 participants; Silje Steinsbekk, Lars Wichstrøm, Tilmann von Soest) with measurements at ages 10, 12, 14 and 16 and facet‑level Big Five analysis showing these exact shifts.
← Back to All Ideas