Test Race‑Pathogen IQ Claims

Updated: 2026.11.14 6H ago 1 sources
Any claim that a pathogen explains a racial IQ gap should be judged by two simple empirical checks: (1) the pathogen×race interaction in representative datasets must be large enough to account for the whole gap; and (2) the gap should largely vanish among seronegative (uninfected) subgroups. Applying those checks to NHANES III shows HSV‑1 fails both tests. — This provides a clear, replicable standard journalists, researchers and policymakers can use to screen and debunk speculative race‑linked disease explanations before they enter public narratives.

Sources

Strong Claims, Weak Germs
Aporia 2026.11.14 100% relevant
Author's reanalysis of NHANES III (1988–94) testing HSV‑1 antibody status against four WISC subtests and a composite, showing required effect sizes (~1.8 SD) and observed HSV‑1×race interaction (~−0.03 SD) mismatch.
← Back to all ideas