Overengineering satellites to last a long time can backfire: once they outlive design life, agencies feel pressure to keep them running, even when cheaper, better replacements exist. Long‑lived craft also risk becoming debris once fuel runs out, forcing others to add costly shielding. A planned cycle of smaller, cheaper satellites with scheduled deorbiting can deliver better science at lower cost.
— This reframes public R&D and climate‑monitoring policy away from monument‑building toward rapid iteration and debris‑aware lifecycle design.
Ed Knight
2025.08.14
100% relevant
OCO‑2 operating in year 11 of a 2‑year mission, the author’s callout of NASA’s 'typical' $750M cost, and his comparison to Planet/Starlink’s frequent‑refresh model and explicit defense of deorbiting.
← Back to All Ideas