Think tanks shape Supreme Court dockets

Updated: 2026.04.23 7H ago 1 sources
The podcast emphasizes that the Manhattan Institute and similar organizations strategically file amicus briefs at the cert (case‑acceptance) stage and claim higher success in getting cases heard. That amplifies how outside groups — not just litigants or governments — influence which legal questions the Court decides. — If think tanks can reliably influence which cases the Supreme Court takes, they effectively shape the legal issues that become national precedents and policy levers.

Sources

Supreme Court Opinion Roundup (with Ilya Shapiro)
Ilya Shapiro, Rafael A. Mangual 2026.04.23 100% relevant
Hosts state the Manhattan Institute files many amicus briefs at the cert stage and boasts a higher‑than‑normal rate of getting cases taken (actor: Manhattan Institute; event: cert‑stage amicus activity; case referenced: Chiles v. Salazar).
← Back to All Ideas