Trigger warnings don’t deter viewing

Updated: 2025.12.03 2D ago 3 sources
A field study from Flinders University reports nearly 90% of young adults clicked through content despite trigger warnings, citing curiosity rather than feeling prepared. This complements lab results showing warnings rarely prompt avoidance and raises the possibility they function as attention magnets. — It challenges a widespread educational and media practice by showing warnings may not protect viewers and could backfire, informing campus policy, platform design, and mental‑health guidance.

Sources

What Makes a Word Beautiful?
Kristen French 2025.12.03 55% relevant
Both items report experimental behavioral findings about how surface features of communication (warnings or phonetic aesthetics) produce counterintuitive effects on attention and memory; Matzinger & Košić’s pseudoword study parallels the Flinders University trigger‑warning field work in showing formal presentation cues can alter uptake and retention in ways that matter for policy, pedagogy, and platform design.
Scientists Discover People Act More Altruistic When Batman Is Present
EditorDavid 2025.11.29 70% relevant
Both the Milan 'Batman effect' and the trigger‑warning study show that small, salient signals alter human attention and downstream behavior in counterintuitive ways (warnings draw attention rather than induce avoidance; a superhero figure increases spontaneous helping even when not consciously noticed). The article supplies an additional empirical case that subtle visual/contextual nudges — not just text‑based warnings — can reorient automatic social responses.
Curiosity Drives Viewers To Ignore Trigger Warnings
BeauHD 2025.10.01 100% relevant
Flinders University study in the Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, reported via Phys.org/Slashdot, measuring real‑life click‑through after trigger warnings.
← Back to All Ideas