A renewed argument is resurfacing that alumni and trustees should actively shape university curricula to inculcate civic and religious virtues rather than leave moral formation to faculty or a neutral marketplace of ideas. Proponents frame this as a duty to produce citizens; opponents warn it would institutionalize catechesis and threaten academic freedom and scholarly inquiry.
— If taken up politically, this idea could shift governance toward trustee control, reshape hiring and curriculum rules, and reframe debates about academic freedom and censorship nationwide.
Cheryl Miller
2026.10.07
100% relevant
William F. Buckley’s claim that trustees and alumni have a 'duty to interfere' in university hiring and curriculum and Robert P. George’s published pushback are the concrete actors and texts driving the idea in the article.
← Back to all ideas