National survey serology (e.g., NHANES HSV‑1 antibodies) plus standardized cognitive tests create a straightforward, falsifiable test for claims that infectious diseases drive group IQ or achievement gaps. By estimating infection prevalence, infection–effect sizes, and the infection×race interaction one can quantify whether a pathogen could plausibly account for observed group differences.
— This method offers a rapid, transparent way to adjudicate provocative biological explanations for racial disparities, reducing speculation and politicized narratives by pointing to concrete data and effect‑size math.
owen
2026.11.14
100% relevant
The article applies NHANES III (1988–94) HSV‑1 seroprevalence and WISC‑R/WRAT‑R subtest scores to show HSV‑1 cannot plausibly explain the Black–White cognitive gap, using prevalence × effect math and interaction tests.
← Back to all ideas