Most people adopt abstract beliefs by 'vibing'—intuitive, status‑coded associations—while slower, evidence‑based analysis often points elsewhere. Hanson argues two constructive contrarian modes: prioritize domain‑specific evidence over vibes, and use discipline‑neutral criteria to adjudicate conflicts across fields (a polymath stance). A third, weaker mode is to embrace contrary vibes for their own sake.
— This gives a practical map for separating status‑driven rhetoric from evidence and for judging cross‑disciplinary claims in politicized debates.
Robin Hanson
2025.09.14
100% relevant
Hanson: 'Most public talk on abstract beliefs is vibes' and his examples about medicine and democracy versus expert evidence.
← Back to All Ideas