The article argues a new phase of 'wokeness' is emerging in which public actors double down on consensus, authority and identity as the primary means of settling disputed facts, rather than transparent evidence and forensic standards. This shift turns debates about justice into contests over who has the socially sanctioned status to be believed, and pushes argument away from method and toward ritualized trust.
— If true, the shift changes where public fights happen — from evidence production (courts, archives, science) to status and narrative control (media, institutions, symbolic politics).
Steve Sailer
2026.04.30
60% relevant
The article presents a concrete instance (a public high school naming its new performing‑arts center after a 94‑year‑old white male alumnus without controversy) that the author interprets as evidence that aggressive identity‑based honorific politics ('wokeness') are less salient locally — this ties to the existing idea that expressions of 'wokeness' are receding to a less confrontational consensus.
2026.04.04
100% relevant
Chris Bray centers the CBC interview with Frances Widdowson and the unresolved Kamloops ground‑penetrating‑radar claim as a concrete example of journalists and institutions defaulting to consensus ('we can just believe indigenous people') despite a lack of recovered remains.
← Back to all ideas