The anti‑woke movement mirrors the motives and methods of the woke and needs ongoing 'Awokenings' to justify itself. By keeping the contest salient even as institutions moderate, the backlash can help catalyze the next cycle rather than end it.
— This reframes culture‑war strategy by suggesting conservative campaigns may be self‑defeating, mobilizing the very forces they aim to extinguish.
2026.01.05
72% relevant
The reviewer notes that attempts to eradicate wokeism (e.g., political victories) are not final and that reactionary pushes can actually prolong the phenomenon; this links to the existing idea that anti‑woke campaigns can feed cycles of renewal rather than ending the movement.
Steve Stewart-Williams
2026.01.01
88% relevant
The article explicitly claims a rising backlash against 'extreme wokeness' and cites viral cultural commentary (Jacob Savage) and conservative columnists (Douthat, Chatterton Williams). That maps directly onto the existing idea that anti‑woke reaction forms a self‑sustaining cycle and reshapes institutional politics.
2025.10.07
100% relevant
Al‑Gharbi’s analysis of Christopher Rufo’s post‑2018 pivot, and his claim that anti‑woke actors attempt to sustain conflict after the Awokening ebbs.