Institutions often encourage some groups to organize by identity while stigmatizing others for doing the same. These double standards erode legitimacy, fuel resentment, and obscure who actually benefits from inequality. A consistent rule‑set across groups would clarify incentives and reduce zero‑sum signaling.
— Explaining polarization through inconsistent identity rules points toward reforms that apply the same standards to all groups, improving trust in public institutions.
Matt Goodwin
2025.09.10
64% relevant
The article argues UK institutions endorse an Islamophobia definition that treats discussing 'Muslim entryism' as Islamophobic, creating asymmetrical speech rules around identity and inhibiting scrutiny of Islamist organizations—conditions that can erode legitimacy and fuel backlash.
eugyppius
2025.08.29
68% relevant
Cologne’s parties pledged not to speak negatively about migration and set church officials as 'arbitrators,' an asymmetric norm that stigmatizes one side of identity politics and risks fueling backlash by granting AfD exclusive license to criticize migration policy.
Yascha Mounk
2025.08.27
100% relevant
Musa al‑Gharbi’s term 'asymmetric multiculturalism' and his call for reflexivity in how scholars analyze behavior across whites/non‑whites and men/women.
N.S. Lyons
2025.01.11
66% relevant
Lyons argues the state privileges minority claims and suppresses majority national identity as part of a 'colonial' strategy, which helps explain the populist backlash described in the existing idea about inconsistent identity rules fueling polarization.