Editors and reviewers can reject replications of famous studies by claiming participants’ prior exposure will bias responses, rendering replication 'impossible.' This sets a perverse incentive: the more public a fragile finding becomes, the harder it is to test. Replication design can mitigate awareness, but the blanket objection functions as a gatekeeping tool.
— If popularity can immunize weak results from scrutiny, science policy must curb this gatekeeping or risk policy built on untested claims.
Lee Jussim
2025.08.26
100% relevant
Nature reviewers reportedly argued that familiarity with Moss‑Racusin (2012) made Jussim's replication non‑credible and thus unpublishable.
← Back to All Ideas