Awareness Shields Block Replication

Updated: 2025.08.26 1M ago 1 sources
Editors and reviewers can reject replications of famous studies by claiming participants’ prior exposure will bias responses, rendering replication 'impossible.' This sets a perverse incentive: the more public a fragile finding becomes, the harder it is to test. Replication design can mitigate awareness, but the blanket objection functions as a gatekeeping tool. — If popularity can immunize weak results from scrutiny, science policy must curb this gatekeeping or risk policy built on untested claims.

Sources

Reviewing Nature's Reviews of Our Proposal to Replicate The Famous Moss-Racusin et al Study on Sex Bias in Science Hiring
Lee Jussim 2025.08.26 100% relevant
Nature reviewers reportedly argued that familiarity with Moss‑Racusin (2012) made Jussim's replication non‑credible and thus unpublishable.
← Back to All Ideas