A concise corrective: attributing 'woke' institutional change to the presence of women is a reductive, politically loaded narrative that conflates correlation with causation and risks legitimizing misogynistic policy responses. Instead, analysts should test mechanisms (incentives, legal changes, managerial incentives, platform dynamics) before making gender‑based explanations.
— Framing wokism as 'women’s nature' can justify rollbacks of anti‑discrimination and other policies, so exposing and refuting that narrative protects democratic institutions, prevents scapegoating, and redirects debate toward structural causes and evidence.
Nathan Cofnas
2026.01.07
100% relevant
Responds to Helen Andrews’s NatCon talk and viral article claiming wokism is the result of women tipping elite institutions to >50% representation (examples: law schools 2016, medical schools 2019), which the author treats as a truthy, causal explanation.
← Back to All Ideas