The article claims legal and institutional reforms won’t durably roll back woke norms because environmentalist elites will reinterpret laws to restore equality-of-outcome aims. It proposes converting elites to hereditarian views so that cultural and legal interpretations shift at the source.
— It recasts the fight over DEI from procedural fixes to an elite‑beliefs campaign, raising profound ethical and political implications for education, media, and governance.
2026.01.05
72% relevant
Winegard frames hereditarian arguments as a direct challenge to contemporary orthodoxies about race and anti‑racist policy, which maps onto the existing idea that promoting hereditarian views can be a deliberate strategy to undermine prevailing DEI narratives and institutional arrangements.
2026.01.04
87% relevant
The Douance reference list explicitly links to works and sites (Lynn & Vanhanen, Christopher Brand, Evopsy, 'capitalisme cognitif') that promote biological explanations for cognitive differences — the exact intellectual mix the existing idea describes as being used tactically to reframe cultural debates and challenge progressive narratives.
Nathan Cofnas
2025.10.09
92% relevant
Cofnas explicitly argues that defeating 'wokism' requires persuading elites that the equality thesis is false—i.e., a hereditarian revolution—rather than relying on procedural or coercive power, which matches the existing idea’s claim that durable reform hinges on changing elite beliefs about heredity.
2025.10.07
100% relevant
Nathan Cofnas: 'Only Hereditarianism Stops the Cycle of Wokism' and call for a 'hereditarian revolution' targeting elite opinion.