The author argues that in populations with similar access to education and information, a general-knowledge test can outpredict a one-off reasoning test for underlying problem-solving ability. Knowledge acts like a long-term average of cognitive performance, while a single reasoning measure is a noisy snapshot.
— This reframes how schools and employers should design assessments and interpret scores, pushing toward batteries and context-appropriate proxies rather than standalone reasoning tests.
Davide Piffer
2025.09.29
100% relevant
Claim that 'g or general knowledge can in certain contexts proxy underlying capacity better than a single direct reasoning test' contingent on 'epistemic opportunity parity.'
← Back to All Ideas