DEI hiring changes since about 2014 produced a concentrated professional setback for millennial white men (those early in career at the pivot), creating a distinct cohort with a material grievance. That cohort’s size, professional concentration, and networked workplace presence make it a plausible seed for sustained institutional pushback and political mobilization.
— If true, cohort‑specific harms from institutional diversity policies can generate durable counter‑movements that reshape elite politics, hiring norms, and trust in institutions.
Dave Greene
2026.01.10
85% relevant
The article echoes and amplifies the existing idea that a distinctive cohort—young, professional white men—has developed concentrated grievances because of post‑2014 DEI policies and demographic shifts; it cites Jacob Savage’s Compact piece as the focal example and frames the problem as generational displacement in admissions, hiring and promotion.
Steve Stewart-Williams
2026.01.01
100% relevant
Jacob Savage’s viral essay (cited in the article) and quoted statistics: TV writer share of white men falling from 48% (2011) to 11.9% (2024); Harvard humanities tenure‑track white men dropping 39% (2014) to 18% (2023).
Trenton
2025.12.31
82% relevant
Jack Napier speaks directly to young men about dating hardship, the 'Trad' revival traps, and leaving 9‑to‑5 work — material that both expresses and helps channel the specific cohort grievance described by the existing idea (a politically consequential group of millennial white men forming identity around perceived setbacks).
← Back to All Ideas