A careful philosophical and conceptual defense can show that older biological definitions of 'race' (e.g., Dobzhansky's) remain coherent and resilient to many modern eliminative critiques. This reframes some social‑construct arguments as conflating extra baggage with the technical biological category.
— If accepted, this argument would shift scientific and policy conversations about genetics, medicine, and diversity from blanket eliminativism to more fine‑grained distinctions that could affect research, clinical practice, and public messaging.
2010.01.12
100% relevant
Neven Sesardić’s 2010 Biology & Philosophy article explicitly critiques contemporary social‑constructivist eliminations of race and defends Dobzhansky‑style biological definitions.
← Back to All Ideas