Studies comparing transwomen to women sometimes normalize performance by body mass or size, which can mathematically erase the very sex‑linked advantages (height, lean mass, absolute power) under debate. Policymakers should require preregistered, sport‑relevant absolute metrics (times, distances, watts) and transparent adjustment rationales before using such studies to set eligibility rules.
— Clarifying how normalization choices flip conclusions improves evidence standards for sex‑category policy and prevents media from amplifying misleading 'parity' claims.
Gregory Brown
2025.09.30
100% relevant
The article details a 2024 IOC‑funded study that compared relatively unfit males to very fit females, then adjusted results for body size to claim parity despite large raw advantages (e.g., 14% higher VO₂max, 15% greater jump power).
← Back to All Ideas