Politically appointed governing boards are asserting power over trustee-selected presidents, using ideological criteria like DEI records as veto triggers. Florida’s Board of Governors’ 10–6 rejection of a unanimously chosen UF candidate is a first for the state and signals a broader shift of control from campus governance to state politics.
— This centralizes higher-ed governance in partisan bodies, reshaping leadership pipelines and institutional autonomy across states.
Lee Jussim
2025.10.04
66% relevant
The article highlights Texas SB 37 and subsequent decisions by the University of Houston and University of Texas systems to dissolve faculty senates, reinforcing the trend of politically appointed state bodies centralizing control over university governance—akin to boards asserting power over campus leadership.
Tyler Cowen
2025.10.01
55% relevant
Florida’s state-driven overhaul of New College (championed by Gov. DeSantis and a new board) exemplifies partisan state control over campus leadership; the article adds outcome data (lower retention/graduation, rankings down, $134k per-student spend) to assess the consequences of such interventions.
Halina Bennet
2025.08.19
100% relevant
Florida Board of Governors’ rejection of Santa Ono despite unanimous UF trustee support and a multimillion-dollar offer.
Omar Sultan Haque, M.D., Ph.D.
2025.08.06
60% relevant
The article’s core contention—that external pressure is necessary for university reform—parallels the growing role of politically appointed boards asserting control over campus leadership, highlighting a shift from internal to external governance.