Across multiple states in 2025, legislators and governors from both parties killed or watered down reforms on gift limits, conflict disclosures, and lobbyist transparency, while some legislatures curtailed ethics commissions’ powers. The trend suggests a coordinated, if decentralized, retreat from accountability mechanisms amid already eroding national ethics norms. Experts warn tactics are getting more creative, making enforcement harder.
— A bipartisan, multi‑state rollback of ethics rules reshapes how corruption is deterred and enforced, undermining public trust and the credibility of democratic institutions.
BeauHD
2026.01.15
75% relevant
This Reuters story about an Italian data‑privacy authority under probe maps onto the broader idea that erosion or failure of independent ethics bodies changes how powerful actors are held accountable; the article names the Garante (Italy’s data watchdog) and its president Pasquale Stanzione, showing how alleged corruption at an oversight body can undercut enforcement against tech multinationals.
msmash
2026.01.15
62% relevant
Both stories are about institutional failure of oversight and accountability: the Boeing/NTSB report shows a manufacturer and regulatory ecosystem treating repeated component fractures as non‑safety problems, mirroring the broader idea that weakening institutional checks (here corporate engineering governance and post‑market response) produces public‑risk.
Richard A. Epstein
2026.01.09
78% relevant
Epstein documents how Louisiana officials and the attorney‑general coordinated with plaintiff lawyers—an example of state actors weakening impartial enforcement and creating conflicts of interest that enable politically driven suits; this ties to the existing idea about multi‑state rollbacks and creative capture of accountability institutions.
PW Daily
2026.01.06
62% relevant
The writeup about Minnesota governor Tim Walz stepping aside amid a massive alleged fraud involving taxpayer funds and community organizations highlights failures of oversight at state/local level and political consequences; that maps onto the documented pattern of weakened ethics and accountability in subnational governments.
msmash
2026.01.05
75% relevant
The article supplies an empirical instance of weak integrity entering and flourishing inside government (higher plagiarism scores among civil‑service entrants and faster promotion). That concrete finding maps onto the existing idea about rollback/weakening of ethics norms in public institutions and shows one mechanism—selection and internal incentives—that can degrade accountability.
2026.01.05
48% relevant
The Minnesota response — creating a state kickback statute and closing billing loopholes — sits in the same governance space as the earlier idea about ethics rules at the state level; here, the legislature tightened enforcement after investigations, illustrating the institutional stakes of state lawmaking in policing corruption and program integrity.
EditorDavid
2026.01.05
72% relevant
The North Dakota episode — fake mineral names apparently derived from lawyers involved in drafting — is a concrete instance of how state legislative processes can be compromised by private actors and weak oversight; it echoes the broader pattern of weakening ethics/transparency at the state level and the practical consequences when drafting and review controls fail.
2026.01.05
55% relevant
Countrywide’s executives and industry practices depended on weak accountability and permissive oversight — the Ethics Unwrapped discussion about biased self‑justification links to the broader pattern of eroded ethics regimes and regulatory capture documented in the existing idea.
Steve Gallant
2026.01.05
52% relevant
The piece argues austerity and managerial decisions (benchmarks, cuts) eroded supervision and internal controls that previously constrained corruption and relationships — a specific case of broader multi‑state patterns where policy and institutional retreat weaken accountability.
Jacob Eisler
2025.12.31
55% relevant
Eisler’s essay flags a rolling retreat of federal supervision over state election law; the existing idea documents a broader pattern of state‑level retrenchment of accountability mechanisms — both signal a multi‑jurisdictional shift in oversight capacity with implications for democratic governance.
Doug Bock Clark
2025.12.29
85% relevant
ProPublica’s reporting on North Carolina is a concrete instance of the broader pattern that the existing idea names: partisan legislatures are changing governance rules (shifting appointment authority for elections boards and regulatory commissions) in ways that reduce independent oversight and accountability. The article names actors (North Carolina GOP legislature, governor Josh Stein, former Sen. Bob Rucho) and policies (reassigning appointments to the auditor/legislature) that match the trend of multi‑state rollbacks and institutional capture.
Charles Ornstein
2025.12.29
82% relevant
ProPublica reports agencies pulling down datasets and blocking press access while framing reporters as intimidators—this is the same institutional retreat from transparency described in the existing item about legislatures and executives weakening oversight (actor: Dept. of Education spokespersons, agency data takedowns).
Tyler Cowen
2025.12.03
72% relevant
Both pieces document how public officials’ leverage and institutional positions convert into private advantage and erosion of accountability; the NBER finding (Wei & Zhou) supplies hard transaction‑level evidence that national legislative leadership produces measurable private financial gains, extending the state‑level ethics rollback theme to Congress.
Halina Bennet
2025.12.01
40% relevant
The article’s emphasis on tracing funds and securing restitution underscores how weak oversight and accountability at state or local levels amplify fraud risk—an instance of the broader pattern where eroded ethics and enforcement capacity let public‑fund abuse proliferate.
Harrison Kass
2025.12.01
54% relevant
The Portland example aligns with the broader pattern of institutional capture altering accountability: instead of legislatures weakening ethics, local nonprofits and caucuses retooled charter rules and staffing to entrench a political faction, producing governance breakdowns (public‑safety, homelessness) described in the piece.
Matt Goodwin
2025.12.01
75% relevant
Goodwin’s article centers on alleged ethical breaches by a senior minister and an imminent referral to the independent ethics adviser; this maps to the broader pattern in the existing idea about weakening or politicised ethics enforcement in government and how that undermines public trust and accountability.
by Gabriel Sandoval, ProPublica, with additional reporting by Nick Reynolds and Anna Wilder, The Post and Courier; Yasmeen Khan, The Maine Monitor; Lauren Dake, Oregon Public Broadcasting; Marjorie Childress, New Mexico In Depth; Louis Hansen, Virginia Center for Investigative Journalism at WHRO; Mary Steurer and Jacob Orledge, North Dakota Monitor; Kate McGee, The Texas Tribune; Alyse Pfeil, The Advocate | The Times-Picayune; and Shauna Sowersby, The Seattle Times
2025.10.01
100% relevant
Examples include Virginia killing a crypto‑disclosure bill for lawmakers, New Mexico’s governor vetoing lobbyist transparency, and North Dakota lawmakers limiting their ethics commission.